mouse anti-human cd8a (Thermo Fisher)
Structured Review

Mouse Anti Human Cd8a, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti-human+cd8a/pmc12278635-16-0-5?v=Thermo+Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Single-cell profiling of bone metastasis ecosystems from multiple cancer types reveals convergent and divergent mechanisms of bone colonization"
Article Title: Single-cell profiling of bone metastasis ecosystems from multiple cancer types reveals convergent and divergent mechanisms of bone colonization
Journal: Cell Genomics
doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100888
Figure Legend Snippet: Immunofluorescence staining verifies distinct immune archetypes (A) Representative fields selected from tissue section immunofluorescence (IF) staining of patients classified by archetypes (columns), highlighting three major cell types (rows). CTSK marks the OC population, CD4 and FOXP3 double-positive signals indicate CD4 Treg populations, and CD8A and TIM3 double-positive signals represent CD8 Tex populations. (B) Cell counting from IF staining of tissue sections from 21 patients, grouped by archetypes: Mφ-OC ( N = 6 patients), Treg-Tex ( N = 8 patients), and Mono ( N = 7 patients). Three major cell types were analyzed: OC cells were manually counted from entire tissue sections. Treg and Tex populations were quantified from selected fields (regions of interest based on CD4 or CD8A positivity, shown in ). Left: Proportion of OC cells out of total cells; Middle: Proportion of CD4 Tregs out of total CD4 T cells; Right: Proportion of CD8 Tex cells out of total CD8 T cells. (Significance test: One-way ANOVA, ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01).
Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Cell Counting
Figure Legend Snippet: Immune archetypes in published dataset (A) Schematic of the workflow for cell type identification and frequency estimation. (Illustration created with BioRender.) (B) Hierarchical clustering of 957 patients (columns) based on estimated cell types and their frequencies (rows). (C) Subset analysis of 158 patients (from B) with cancer metastasis to the bones. Patients were clustered into three groups based on the frequencies of selected cell types: Monocytes, Mφ, OC, CD4 Treg, CD8 pTex, and CD8 Tex. (D) Confusion matrix displaying the correlation clustering of matched patients based on the cell frequencies of selected cell types (from C), comparing the primary breast tumor microenvironment (TME) with their bone metastasis TME. (E) Confusion matrix displaying patient clustering based on the frequencies of selected cell types, annotated with patients' progression-free survival (PFS). (F) Correlation analysis of patients from (E), examining the relationship between PFS probability and the expression of Treg and Tex cell signatures (Treg/Tex infiltration). The analysis was conducted across different metastatic tissues ( p values reported from Log Rank Test).
Techniques Used: Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Distinct differentiation routes of myeloid populations and T lymphocytes (A) Trajectory inferences of myeloid and T cells (columns) across archetypes (rows). Streamlines in the background UMAP represent unbiased, calculated cell state transitions, while arrows and gradient-colored dots depict supervised least action paths (LAPs), directed from designated initiating cell populations to terminal cell populations: CD14hi Mono to Mϕ/OC (Myeloid), naive CD4 T to CD4 Treg (CD4 T), and CD8 Teff to CD8 Tex (CD8 T). (B) Gene expression kinetics (RNA velocity). Clear and visible kinetic shifts indicate committed differentiation events. (C) Gene expression accelerations (a derivative of RNA velocity). Distinct and visible acceleration shifts indicate committed differentiation potential.
Techniques Used: Gene Expression


