Review



mouse anti-human cd8a  (Thermo Fisher)


Bioz Verified Symbol Thermo Fisher is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Thermo Fisher manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Thermo Fisher mouse anti-human cd8a
    Immunofluorescence staining verifies distinct immune archetypes (A) Representative fields selected from tissue section immunofluorescence (IF) staining of patients classified by archetypes (columns), highlighting three major cell types (rows). CTSK marks the OC population, CD4 and FOXP3 double-positive signals indicate CD4 Treg populations, and <t>CD8A</t> and TIM3 double-positive signals represent CD8 Tex populations. (B) Cell counting from IF staining of tissue sections from 21 patients, grouped by archetypes: Mφ-OC ( N = 6 patients), Treg-Tex ( N = 8 patients), and Mono ( N = 7 patients). Three major cell types were analyzed: OC cells were manually counted from entire tissue sections. Treg and Tex populations were quantified from selected fields (regions of interest based on CD4 or CD8A positivity, shown in ). Left: Proportion of OC cells out of total cells; Middle: Proportion of CD4 Tregs out of total CD4 T cells; Right: Proportion of CD8 Tex cells out of total CD8 T cells. (Significance test: One-way ANOVA, ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01).
    Mouse Anti Human Cd8a, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti-human+cd8a/pmc12278635-16-0-5?v=Thermo+Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti-human cd8a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Single-cell profiling of bone metastasis ecosystems from multiple cancer types reveals convergent and divergent mechanisms of bone colonization"

    Article Title: Single-cell profiling of bone metastasis ecosystems from multiple cancer types reveals convergent and divergent mechanisms of bone colonization

    Journal: Cell Genomics

    doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100888

    Immunofluorescence staining verifies distinct immune archetypes (A) Representative fields selected from tissue section immunofluorescence (IF) staining of patients classified by archetypes (columns), highlighting three major cell types (rows). CTSK marks the OC population, CD4 and FOXP3 double-positive signals indicate CD4 Treg populations, and CD8A and TIM3 double-positive signals represent CD8 Tex populations. (B) Cell counting from IF staining of tissue sections from 21 patients, grouped by archetypes: Mφ-OC ( N = 6 patients), Treg-Tex ( N = 8 patients), and Mono ( N = 7 patients). Three major cell types were analyzed: OC cells were manually counted from entire tissue sections. Treg and Tex populations were quantified from selected fields (regions of interest based on CD4 or CD8A positivity, shown in ). Left: Proportion of OC cells out of total cells; Middle: Proportion of CD4 Tregs out of total CD4 T cells; Right: Proportion of CD8 Tex cells out of total CD8 T cells. (Significance test: One-way ANOVA, ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Immunofluorescence staining verifies distinct immune archetypes (A) Representative fields selected from tissue section immunofluorescence (IF) staining of patients classified by archetypes (columns), highlighting three major cell types (rows). CTSK marks the OC population, CD4 and FOXP3 double-positive signals indicate CD4 Treg populations, and CD8A and TIM3 double-positive signals represent CD8 Tex populations. (B) Cell counting from IF staining of tissue sections from 21 patients, grouped by archetypes: Mφ-OC ( N = 6 patients), Treg-Tex ( N = 8 patients), and Mono ( N = 7 patients). Three major cell types were analyzed: OC cells were manually counted from entire tissue sections. Treg and Tex populations were quantified from selected fields (regions of interest based on CD4 or CD8A positivity, shown in ). Left: Proportion of OC cells out of total cells; Middle: Proportion of CD4 Tregs out of total CD4 T cells; Right: Proportion of CD8 Tex cells out of total CD8 T cells. (Significance test: One-way ANOVA, ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01).

    Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Cell Counting

    Immune archetypes in published dataset (A) Schematic of the workflow for cell type identification and frequency estimation. (Illustration created with BioRender.) (B) Hierarchical clustering of 957 patients (columns) based on estimated cell types and their frequencies (rows). (C) Subset analysis of 158 patients (from B) with cancer metastasis to the bones. Patients were clustered into three groups based on the frequencies of selected cell types: Monocytes, Mφ, OC, CD4 Treg, CD8 pTex, and CD8 Tex. (D) Confusion matrix displaying the correlation clustering of matched patients based on the cell frequencies of selected cell types (from C), comparing the primary breast tumor microenvironment (TME) with their bone metastasis TME. (E) Confusion matrix displaying patient clustering based on the frequencies of selected cell types, annotated with patients' progression-free survival (PFS). (F) Correlation analysis of patients from (E), examining the relationship between PFS probability and the expression of Treg and Tex cell signatures (Treg/Tex infiltration). The analysis was conducted across different metastatic tissues ( p values reported from Log Rank Test).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Immune archetypes in published dataset (A) Schematic of the workflow for cell type identification and frequency estimation. (Illustration created with BioRender.) (B) Hierarchical clustering of 957 patients (columns) based on estimated cell types and their frequencies (rows). (C) Subset analysis of 158 patients (from B) with cancer metastasis to the bones. Patients were clustered into three groups based on the frequencies of selected cell types: Monocytes, Mφ, OC, CD4 Treg, CD8 pTex, and CD8 Tex. (D) Confusion matrix displaying the correlation clustering of matched patients based on the cell frequencies of selected cell types (from C), comparing the primary breast tumor microenvironment (TME) with their bone metastasis TME. (E) Confusion matrix displaying patient clustering based on the frequencies of selected cell types, annotated with patients' progression-free survival (PFS). (F) Correlation analysis of patients from (E), examining the relationship between PFS probability and the expression of Treg and Tex cell signatures (Treg/Tex infiltration). The analysis was conducted across different metastatic tissues ( p values reported from Log Rank Test).

    Techniques Used: Expressing

    Distinct differentiation routes of myeloid populations and T lymphocytes (A) Trajectory inferences of myeloid and T cells (columns) across archetypes (rows). Streamlines in the background UMAP represent unbiased, calculated cell state transitions, while arrows and gradient-colored dots depict supervised least action paths (LAPs), directed from designated initiating cell populations to terminal cell populations: CD14hi Mono to Mϕ/OC (Myeloid), naive CD4 T to CD4 Treg (CD4 T), and CD8 Teff to CD8 Tex (CD8 T). (B) Gene expression kinetics (RNA velocity). Clear and visible kinetic shifts indicate committed differentiation events. (C) Gene expression accelerations (a derivative of RNA velocity). Distinct and visible acceleration shifts indicate committed differentiation potential.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Distinct differentiation routes of myeloid populations and T lymphocytes (A) Trajectory inferences of myeloid and T cells (columns) across archetypes (rows). Streamlines in the background UMAP represent unbiased, calculated cell state transitions, while arrows and gradient-colored dots depict supervised least action paths (LAPs), directed from designated initiating cell populations to terminal cell populations: CD14hi Mono to Mϕ/OC (Myeloid), naive CD4 T to CD4 Treg (CD4 T), and CD8 Teff to CD8 Tex (CD8 T). (B) Gene expression kinetics (RNA velocity). Clear and visible kinetic shifts indicate committed differentiation events. (C) Gene expression accelerations (a derivative of RNA velocity). Distinct and visible acceleration shifts indicate committed differentiation potential.

    Techniques Used: Gene Expression



    Similar Products

    93
    Miltenyi Biotec mouse cd8a t cell isolation kit
    Mouse Cd8a T Cell Isolation Kit, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti-human+cd8a/pmc12559718-397-18-26?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse cd8a t cell isolation kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    OriGene anti human cd8a
    <t>CD8</t> T cell-rich zones were present in both pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies. Patient biopsies were collected at 0 weeks (baseline, pre-treatment) and at 12 weeks (post-treatment) and stored as FFPE blocks. Tissue sections (5 µm thick) were obtained and processed for either nCounter (A) or GeoMx analysis (B-D). The whole section was digested to extract RNA and processed following the nCounter workflow, whereas CD8 T cell rich or excluded regions were selected for processing through the GeoMx workflow. Volcano plots resulting from the differential expression analysis are presented here. Gene expression levels between pre- and post-treatment samples were compared using nCounter (A). Protein expression levels in CD8 T cell-rich ROIs between pre- and post-treatment samples were compared using GeoMx (B), and protein expression levels in CD8 T cell-rich regions were Compared to CD8 T cell excluded regions using pre-treatment biopsy samples (C) or in post-treatment biopsy samples using GeoMx (D). The arrows highlight the genes discussed related to the nCounter analysis. p < 0.05 as represented by log 10 ( p -value) >1.3 was considered to be statistically significant and is marked by dashed and dotted green lines in all plots. Fold change of >2 or <–2, as represented by log2(fold change) >1 or <–1 were considered significant changes in expression and are marked by dashed red lines in each plot.
    Anti Human Cd8a, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti-human+cd8a/pmc12710901-52-1-14?v=OriGene
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti human cd8a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    fluidigm mouse monoclonal cd8a
    <t>CD8</t> T cell-rich zones were present in both pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies. Patient biopsies were collected at 0 weeks (baseline, pre-treatment) and at 12 weeks (post-treatment) and stored as FFPE blocks. Tissue sections (5 µm thick) were obtained and processed for either nCounter (A) or GeoMx analysis (B-D). The whole section was digested to extract RNA and processed following the nCounter workflow, whereas CD8 T cell rich or excluded regions were selected for processing through the GeoMx workflow. Volcano plots resulting from the differential expression analysis are presented here. Gene expression levels between pre- and post-treatment samples were compared using nCounter (A). Protein expression levels in CD8 T cell-rich ROIs between pre- and post-treatment samples were compared using GeoMx (B), and protein expression levels in CD8 T cell-rich regions were Compared to CD8 T cell excluded regions using pre-treatment biopsy samples (C) or in post-treatment biopsy samples using GeoMx (D). The arrows highlight the genes discussed related to the nCounter analysis. p < 0.05 as represented by log 10 ( p -value) >1.3 was considered to be statistically significant and is marked by dashed and dotted green lines in all plots. Fold change of >2 or <–2, as represented by log2(fold change) >1 or <–1 were considered significant changes in expression and are marked by dashed red lines in each plot.
    Mouse Monoclonal Cd8a, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti-human+cd8a/pmc12460890__41467_2025_63862_MOESM9_ESM-79-154-159?v=fluidigm
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal cd8a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Becton Dickinson anti-cd8a alexa fluor 700 mouse anti-human cd8
    <t>CD8</t> T cell-rich zones were present in both pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies. Patient biopsies were collected at 0 weeks (baseline, pre-treatment) and at 12 weeks (post-treatment) and stored as FFPE blocks. Tissue sections (5 µm thick) were obtained and processed for either nCounter (A) or GeoMx analysis (B-D). The whole section was digested to extract RNA and processed following the nCounter workflow, whereas CD8 T cell rich or excluded regions were selected for processing through the GeoMx workflow. Volcano plots resulting from the differential expression analysis are presented here. Gene expression levels between pre- and post-treatment samples were compared using nCounter (A). Protein expression levels in CD8 T cell-rich ROIs between pre- and post-treatment samples were compared using GeoMx (B), and protein expression levels in CD8 T cell-rich regions were Compared to CD8 T cell excluded regions using pre-treatment biopsy samples (C) or in post-treatment biopsy samples using GeoMx (D). The arrows highlight the genes discussed related to the nCounter analysis. p < 0.05 as represented by log 10 ( p -value) >1.3 was considered to be statistically significant and is marked by dashed and dotted green lines in all plots. Fold change of >2 or <–2, as represented by log2(fold change) >1 or <–1 were considered significant changes in expression and are marked by dashed red lines in each plot.
    Anti Cd8a Alexa Fluor 700 Mouse Anti Human Cd8, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti-human+cd8a/pmc11387495__41467_2024_52139_MOESM9_ESM-69-0-1?v=Becton+Dickinson
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-cd8a alexa fluor 700 mouse anti-human cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher mouse anti-human cd8a
    Immunofluorescence staining verifies distinct immune archetypes (A) Representative fields selected from tissue section immunofluorescence (IF) staining of patients classified by archetypes (columns), highlighting three major cell types (rows). CTSK marks the OC population, CD4 and FOXP3 double-positive signals indicate CD4 Treg populations, and <t>CD8A</t> and TIM3 double-positive signals represent CD8 Tex populations. (B) Cell counting from IF staining of tissue sections from 21 patients, grouped by archetypes: Mφ-OC ( N = 6 patients), Treg-Tex ( N = 8 patients), and Mono ( N = 7 patients). Three major cell types were analyzed: OC cells were manually counted from entire tissue sections. Treg and Tex populations were quantified from selected fields (regions of interest based on CD4 or CD8A positivity, shown in ). Left: Proportion of OC cells out of total cells; Middle: Proportion of CD4 Tregs out of total CD4 T cells; Right: Proportion of CD8 Tex cells out of total CD8 T cells. (Significance test: One-way ANOVA, ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01).
    Mouse Anti Human Cd8a, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti-human+cd8a/pmc12278635-16-0-5?v=Thermo+Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti-human cd8a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    fluidigm mouse monoclonal anti human cd8a

    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Human Cd8a, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti-human+cd8a/pmc11687933-22-2-9?v=fluidigm
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti human cd8a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Becton Dickinson mouse anti-human cd8a-fitc

    Mouse Anti Human Cd8a Fitc, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti-human+cd8a/pm39578482-255-1-3?v=Becton+Dickinson
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti-human cd8a-fitc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    R&D Systems mouse anti cd8a

    Mouse Anti Cd8a, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti-human+cd8a/pm39560673-527-57-62?v=R%26D+Systems
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti cd8a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher mouse anti-human cd8a monoclonal antibody
    ( A and B ) Illustration of IAV- and bleomycin-induced lung injury models. Sac, sacrifice. ( C and D ) Immunofluorescence staining for KRT5 and SCGB1A1 in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs. Data are representative of sections from 3 mice. Scale bars: 500 μm (top row); 50 μm (bottom row). ( E and F ) Immunofluorescence images of dysplastic cells (KRT5 + PDPN + ) and AT1 (PDPN + ) cells. Scale bars: 500 μm (top row); 50 μm (bottom row). ( G ) Quantification of percentages of KRT5 + lung areas in total damaged alveolar areas (PDPN – and KRT5 + ) in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs ( n ≥ 4 mice per group). ( H ) Krt5 expression was assayed by qRT-PCR in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs ( n = 3 mice per group). ( I and J ) PAS staining and quantification of goblet cells in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs ( n = 5 mice per group). Scale bar: 50 μm. ( K ) Inflammatory factor mRNA expression was assayed by qRT-PCR in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs at indicated time points ( n = 3 mice per group). ( L ) Flow cytometry analysis of immune cells from PBS-, repetitive bleomycin–, or IAV-treated lungs at indicated time points ( n = 4 mice per group). ( M ) Immunofluorescence staining for CD4, <t>CD8a,</t> F4/80, CCR2, or NK1.1 with KRT5 in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs at 14 dpi. Data are representative of sections from 3 mice. Scale bar: 50 μm. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Error bars represent means ± SEM. Multiple t tests ( H , K , and L ); 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U test ( G and J ).
    Mouse Anti Human Cd8a Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+anti-human+cd8a/pmc11444164-176-211-218?v=Thermo+Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti-human cd8a monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    CD8 T cell-rich zones were present in both pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies. Patient biopsies were collected at 0 weeks (baseline, pre-treatment) and at 12 weeks (post-treatment) and stored as FFPE blocks. Tissue sections (5 µm thick) were obtained and processed for either nCounter (A) or GeoMx analysis (B-D). The whole section was digested to extract RNA and processed following the nCounter workflow, whereas CD8 T cell rich or excluded regions were selected for processing through the GeoMx workflow. Volcano plots resulting from the differential expression analysis are presented here. Gene expression levels between pre- and post-treatment samples were compared using nCounter (A). Protein expression levels in CD8 T cell-rich ROIs between pre- and post-treatment samples were compared using GeoMx (B), and protein expression levels in CD8 T cell-rich regions were Compared to CD8 T cell excluded regions using pre-treatment biopsy samples (C) or in post-treatment biopsy samples using GeoMx (D). The arrows highlight the genes discussed related to the nCounter analysis. p < 0.05 as represented by log 10 ( p -value) >1.3 was considered to be statistically significant and is marked by dashed and dotted green lines in all plots. Fold change of >2 or <–2, as represented by log2(fold change) >1 or <–1 were considered significant changes in expression and are marked by dashed red lines in each plot.

    Journal: Oncoimmunology

    Article Title: Prostate tumor immune microenvironment changes following immunotherapy shared by patients who developed anti-tumor response or immune-related adverse events

    doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2025.2595788

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CD8 T cell-rich zones were present in both pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies. Patient biopsies were collected at 0 weeks (baseline, pre-treatment) and at 12 weeks (post-treatment) and stored as FFPE blocks. Tissue sections (5 µm thick) were obtained and processed for either nCounter (A) or GeoMx analysis (B-D). The whole section was digested to extract RNA and processed following the nCounter workflow, whereas CD8 T cell rich or excluded regions were selected for processing through the GeoMx workflow. Volcano plots resulting from the differential expression analysis are presented here. Gene expression levels between pre- and post-treatment samples were compared using nCounter (A). Protein expression levels in CD8 T cell-rich ROIs between pre- and post-treatment samples were compared using GeoMx (B), and protein expression levels in CD8 T cell-rich regions were Compared to CD8 T cell excluded regions using pre-treatment biopsy samples (C) or in post-treatment biopsy samples using GeoMx (D). The arrows highlight the genes discussed related to the nCounter analysis. p < 0.05 as represented by log 10 ( p -value) >1.3 was considered to be statistically significant and is marked by dashed and dotted green lines in all plots. Fold change of >2 or <–2, as represented by log2(fold change) >1 or <–1 were considered significant changes in expression and are marked by dashed red lines in each plot.

    Article Snippet: An anti-human CD8a (Clone ID: OTI3H6) monoclonal antibody (Cat# CF802079 ) was purchased from Origene and conjugated with AF647 using Alexa Fluor 647 antibody labeling kit (Cat# A20186 , Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

    Techniques: Quantitative Proteomics, Gene Expression, Expressing

    Markers associated with dendritic cells and antigen presentation were associated with the clinical response. Patient biopsies collected pre- and post-treatment were processed as described in . Volcano plots resulting from the differential expression analysis are presented here. Gene expression levels between responders and non-responders were compared using nCounter within pre-treatment biopsy samples (A) or in post-treatment biopsy samples (B). Protein expression levels between responders and non-responders were compared within post-treatment biopsy samples using GeoMx (C), and protein expression levels in CD8 T cell rich regions were compared between responders and non-responders using both pre- and post-treatment biopsy samples (D). The arrows highlight the genes discussed related to the nCounter analysis. p < 0.05 as represented by log 10 ( p -value) >1.3 was considered to be statistically significant and is marked by dashed and dotted green lines in all plots. Fold change of >2 or <−2 as represented by log2(fold change) >1 or <−1 was considered to be a significant change in expression and is marked by dashed red lines in each plot.

    Journal: Oncoimmunology

    Article Title: Prostate tumor immune microenvironment changes following immunotherapy shared by patients who developed anti-tumor response or immune-related adverse events

    doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2025.2595788

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Markers associated with dendritic cells and antigen presentation were associated with the clinical response. Patient biopsies collected pre- and post-treatment were processed as described in . Volcano plots resulting from the differential expression analysis are presented here. Gene expression levels between responders and non-responders were compared using nCounter within pre-treatment biopsy samples (A) or in post-treatment biopsy samples (B). Protein expression levels between responders and non-responders were compared within post-treatment biopsy samples using GeoMx (C), and protein expression levels in CD8 T cell rich regions were compared between responders and non-responders using both pre- and post-treatment biopsy samples (D). The arrows highlight the genes discussed related to the nCounter analysis. p < 0.05 as represented by log 10 ( p -value) >1.3 was considered to be statistically significant and is marked by dashed and dotted green lines in all plots. Fold change of >2 or <−2 as represented by log2(fold change) >1 or <−1 was considered to be a significant change in expression and is marked by dashed red lines in each plot.

    Article Snippet: An anti-human CD8a (Clone ID: OTI3H6) monoclonal antibody (Cat# CF802079 ) was purchased from Origene and conjugated with AF647 using Alexa Fluor 647 antibody labeling kit (Cat# A20186 , Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

    Techniques: Immunopeptidomics, Quantitative Proteomics, Gene Expression, Expressing

    Patients who developed irAEs showed increased T cell activation; whereas PARP expression was elevated in patients that did not develop an irAE. Patient biopsies collected pre- and post-treatment were processed as described in . Volcano plots resulting from the differential expression analysis are presented here. Gene expression levels between patients who experienced an irAE or did not experience irAEs were compared using nCounter within post-treatment biopsy samples (A). Protein expression levels between patients who experienced an irAE or did not experience an irAE were compared within post-treatment biopsy samples using GeoMx (B), and protein expression levels in CD8 T cell rich regions were compared between patients who experienced an irAE or did not experience an irAE within post-treatment biopsy samples (C). The arrows highlight the genes discussed related to the nCounter analysis. p < 0.05 as represented by log 10 ( p -value) >1.3 was considered to be statistically significant and is marked by dashed and dotted green lines in all plots. Fold change of >2 or <−2, as represented by log2(fold change) >1 or <–1 were considered to be a significant change in expression and are marked by dashed red lines in each plot.

    Journal: Oncoimmunology

    Article Title: Prostate tumor immune microenvironment changes following immunotherapy shared by patients who developed anti-tumor response or immune-related adverse events

    doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2025.2595788

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Patients who developed irAEs showed increased T cell activation; whereas PARP expression was elevated in patients that did not develop an irAE. Patient biopsies collected pre- and post-treatment were processed as described in . Volcano plots resulting from the differential expression analysis are presented here. Gene expression levels between patients who experienced an irAE or did not experience irAEs were compared using nCounter within post-treatment biopsy samples (A). Protein expression levels between patients who experienced an irAE or did not experience an irAE were compared within post-treatment biopsy samples using GeoMx (B), and protein expression levels in CD8 T cell rich regions were compared between patients who experienced an irAE or did not experience an irAE within post-treatment biopsy samples (C). The arrows highlight the genes discussed related to the nCounter analysis. p < 0.05 as represented by log 10 ( p -value) >1.3 was considered to be statistically significant and is marked by dashed and dotted green lines in all plots. Fold change of >2 or <−2, as represented by log2(fold change) >1 or <–1 were considered to be a significant change in expression and are marked by dashed red lines in each plot.

    Article Snippet: An anti-human CD8a (Clone ID: OTI3H6) monoclonal antibody (Cat# CF802079 ) was purchased from Origene and conjugated with AF647 using Alexa Fluor 647 antibody labeling kit (Cat# A20186 , Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Expressing, Quantitative Proteomics, Gene Expression

    Immunofluorescence staining verifies distinct immune archetypes (A) Representative fields selected from tissue section immunofluorescence (IF) staining of patients classified by archetypes (columns), highlighting three major cell types (rows). CTSK marks the OC population, CD4 and FOXP3 double-positive signals indicate CD4 Treg populations, and CD8A and TIM3 double-positive signals represent CD8 Tex populations. (B) Cell counting from IF staining of tissue sections from 21 patients, grouped by archetypes: Mφ-OC ( N = 6 patients), Treg-Tex ( N = 8 patients), and Mono ( N = 7 patients). Three major cell types were analyzed: OC cells were manually counted from entire tissue sections. Treg and Tex populations were quantified from selected fields (regions of interest based on CD4 or CD8A positivity, shown in ). Left: Proportion of OC cells out of total cells; Middle: Proportion of CD4 Tregs out of total CD4 T cells; Right: Proportion of CD8 Tex cells out of total CD8 T cells. (Significance test: One-way ANOVA, ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01).

    Journal: Cell Genomics

    Article Title: Single-cell profiling of bone metastasis ecosystems from multiple cancer types reveals convergent and divergent mechanisms of bone colonization

    doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100888

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunofluorescence staining verifies distinct immune archetypes (A) Representative fields selected from tissue section immunofluorescence (IF) staining of patients classified by archetypes (columns), highlighting three major cell types (rows). CTSK marks the OC population, CD4 and FOXP3 double-positive signals indicate CD4 Treg populations, and CD8A and TIM3 double-positive signals represent CD8 Tex populations. (B) Cell counting from IF staining of tissue sections from 21 patients, grouped by archetypes: Mφ-OC ( N = 6 patients), Treg-Tex ( N = 8 patients), and Mono ( N = 7 patients). Three major cell types were analyzed: OC cells were manually counted from entire tissue sections. Treg and Tex populations were quantified from selected fields (regions of interest based on CD4 or CD8A positivity, shown in ). Left: Proportion of OC cells out of total cells; Middle: Proportion of CD4 Tregs out of total CD4 T cells; Right: Proportion of CD8 Tex cells out of total CD8 T cells. (Significance test: One-way ANOVA, ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01).

    Article Snippet: Mouse anti-Human CD8a, 1:500 , ThermoFisher scientific , Cat#14-0008-82; RRID: AB_2572848.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Cell Counting

    Immune archetypes in published dataset (A) Schematic of the workflow for cell type identification and frequency estimation. (Illustration created with BioRender.) (B) Hierarchical clustering of 957 patients (columns) based on estimated cell types and their frequencies (rows). (C) Subset analysis of 158 patients (from B) with cancer metastasis to the bones. Patients were clustered into three groups based on the frequencies of selected cell types: Monocytes, Mφ, OC, CD4 Treg, CD8 pTex, and CD8 Tex. (D) Confusion matrix displaying the correlation clustering of matched patients based on the cell frequencies of selected cell types (from C), comparing the primary breast tumor microenvironment (TME) with their bone metastasis TME. (E) Confusion matrix displaying patient clustering based on the frequencies of selected cell types, annotated with patients' progression-free survival (PFS). (F) Correlation analysis of patients from (E), examining the relationship between PFS probability and the expression of Treg and Tex cell signatures (Treg/Tex infiltration). The analysis was conducted across different metastatic tissues ( p values reported from Log Rank Test).

    Journal: Cell Genomics

    Article Title: Single-cell profiling of bone metastasis ecosystems from multiple cancer types reveals convergent and divergent mechanisms of bone colonization

    doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100888

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Immune archetypes in published dataset (A) Schematic of the workflow for cell type identification and frequency estimation. (Illustration created with BioRender.) (B) Hierarchical clustering of 957 patients (columns) based on estimated cell types and their frequencies (rows). (C) Subset analysis of 158 patients (from B) with cancer metastasis to the bones. Patients were clustered into three groups based on the frequencies of selected cell types: Monocytes, Mφ, OC, CD4 Treg, CD8 pTex, and CD8 Tex. (D) Confusion matrix displaying the correlation clustering of matched patients based on the cell frequencies of selected cell types (from C), comparing the primary breast tumor microenvironment (TME) with their bone metastasis TME. (E) Confusion matrix displaying patient clustering based on the frequencies of selected cell types, annotated with patients' progression-free survival (PFS). (F) Correlation analysis of patients from (E), examining the relationship between PFS probability and the expression of Treg and Tex cell signatures (Treg/Tex infiltration). The analysis was conducted across different metastatic tissues ( p values reported from Log Rank Test).

    Article Snippet: Mouse anti-Human CD8a, 1:500 , ThermoFisher scientific , Cat#14-0008-82; RRID: AB_2572848.

    Techniques: Expressing

    Distinct differentiation routes of myeloid populations and T lymphocytes (A) Trajectory inferences of myeloid and T cells (columns) across archetypes (rows). Streamlines in the background UMAP represent unbiased, calculated cell state transitions, while arrows and gradient-colored dots depict supervised least action paths (LAPs), directed from designated initiating cell populations to terminal cell populations: CD14hi Mono to Mϕ/OC (Myeloid), naive CD4 T to CD4 Treg (CD4 T), and CD8 Teff to CD8 Tex (CD8 T). (B) Gene expression kinetics (RNA velocity). Clear and visible kinetic shifts indicate committed differentiation events. (C) Gene expression accelerations (a derivative of RNA velocity). Distinct and visible acceleration shifts indicate committed differentiation potential.

    Journal: Cell Genomics

    Article Title: Single-cell profiling of bone metastasis ecosystems from multiple cancer types reveals convergent and divergent mechanisms of bone colonization

    doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100888

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Distinct differentiation routes of myeloid populations and T lymphocytes (A) Trajectory inferences of myeloid and T cells (columns) across archetypes (rows). Streamlines in the background UMAP represent unbiased, calculated cell state transitions, while arrows and gradient-colored dots depict supervised least action paths (LAPs), directed from designated initiating cell populations to terminal cell populations: CD14hi Mono to Mϕ/OC (Myeloid), naive CD4 T to CD4 Treg (CD4 T), and CD8 Teff to CD8 Tex (CD8 T). (B) Gene expression kinetics (RNA velocity). Clear and visible kinetic shifts indicate committed differentiation events. (C) Gene expression accelerations (a derivative of RNA velocity). Distinct and visible acceleration shifts indicate committed differentiation potential.

    Article Snippet: Mouse anti-Human CD8a, 1:500 , ThermoFisher scientific , Cat#14-0008-82; RRID: AB_2572848.

    Techniques: Gene Expression

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: JAK inhibition decreases the autoimmune burden in Down syndrome

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.99323

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Antibody , Mouse monoclonal anti-human CD8a (clone RPA-T8) , Fluidigm , Cat # 3162015; RRID: AB_2661802 , Lot 0171813, 1:100.

    Techniques: Isolation, Biomarker Discovery, Staining, Antibody Labeling, Software, Sequencing

    ( A and B ) Illustration of IAV- and bleomycin-induced lung injury models. Sac, sacrifice. ( C and D ) Immunofluorescence staining for KRT5 and SCGB1A1 in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs. Data are representative of sections from 3 mice. Scale bars: 500 μm (top row); 50 μm (bottom row). ( E and F ) Immunofluorescence images of dysplastic cells (KRT5 + PDPN + ) and AT1 (PDPN + ) cells. Scale bars: 500 μm (top row); 50 μm (bottom row). ( G ) Quantification of percentages of KRT5 + lung areas in total damaged alveolar areas (PDPN – and KRT5 + ) in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs ( n ≥ 4 mice per group). ( H ) Krt5 expression was assayed by qRT-PCR in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs ( n = 3 mice per group). ( I and J ) PAS staining and quantification of goblet cells in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs ( n = 5 mice per group). Scale bar: 50 μm. ( K ) Inflammatory factor mRNA expression was assayed by qRT-PCR in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs at indicated time points ( n = 3 mice per group). ( L ) Flow cytometry analysis of immune cells from PBS-, repetitive bleomycin–, or IAV-treated lungs at indicated time points ( n = 4 mice per group). ( M ) Immunofluorescence staining for CD4, CD8a, F4/80, CCR2, or NK1.1 with KRT5 in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs at 14 dpi. Data are representative of sections from 3 mice. Scale bar: 50 μm. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Error bars represent means ± SEM. Multiple t tests ( H , K , and L ); 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U test ( G and J ).

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: Viral infection induces inflammatory signals that coordinate YAP regulation of dysplastic cells in lung alveoli

    doi: 10.1172/JCI176828

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A and B ) Illustration of IAV- and bleomycin-induced lung injury models. Sac, sacrifice. ( C and D ) Immunofluorescence staining for KRT5 and SCGB1A1 in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs. Data are representative of sections from 3 mice. Scale bars: 500 μm (top row); 50 μm (bottom row). ( E and F ) Immunofluorescence images of dysplastic cells (KRT5 + PDPN + ) and AT1 (PDPN + ) cells. Scale bars: 500 μm (top row); 50 μm (bottom row). ( G ) Quantification of percentages of KRT5 + lung areas in total damaged alveolar areas (PDPN – and KRT5 + ) in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs ( n ≥ 4 mice per group). ( H ) Krt5 expression was assayed by qRT-PCR in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs ( n = 3 mice per group). ( I and J ) PAS staining and quantification of goblet cells in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs ( n = 5 mice per group). Scale bar: 50 μm. ( K ) Inflammatory factor mRNA expression was assayed by qRT-PCR in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs at indicated time points ( n = 3 mice per group). ( L ) Flow cytometry analysis of immune cells from PBS-, repetitive bleomycin–, or IAV-treated lungs at indicated time points ( n = 4 mice per group). ( M ) Immunofluorescence staining for CD4, CD8a, F4/80, CCR2, or NK1.1 with KRT5 in IAV- and bleomycin-injured lungs at 14 dpi. Data are representative of sections from 3 mice. Scale bar: 50 μm. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Error bars represent means ± SEM. Multiple t tests ( H , K , and L ); 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U test ( G and J ).

    Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used at the indicated concentrations for immunofluorescence staining: goat anti-SCGB3A2 polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (R&D Systems, AF3465), rat anti-ITGB4 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 123615), rat anti-F4/80 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 111603), rabbit anti-CCR2 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Abcam, ab216863), rabbit anti-KRT5 polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 905504), chicken anti-KRT5 polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 905903), mouse anti-SCGB1A1 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., sc-365992), rabbit anti-CCSP polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Seven Hills, WRAB-3950), mouse anti-FOXJ1 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Invitrogen, 14-9965-82), hamster anti-PDPN monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Invitrogen, 14-5381-82), rat anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 100427), rat anti-CD8a monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 100707), mouse anti-NK1.1 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 108729), rabbit anti-DCAMKL1 polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Abcam, ab31704), rabbit anti-proSPC polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (MilliporeSigma, AB3786), rabbit anti-phospho-Src(Tyr416) polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Cell Signaling Technology, 2101S), rabbit anti-YAP polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Cell Signaling Technology, 4912S), mouse anti-KI67 monoclonal antibody(5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 151204), rabbit anti-KI67 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Cell Signaling Technology, 9129S), mouse anti-P63 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Abcam, ab735), mouse anti-KRT17 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., sc-393002), rat anti-KRT8 polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (DSHB, Troma-1), mouse anti-human HTII-280 (5 μg/mL) (Terrace Biotech, TB-27AHT2-280), and mouse anti-human CD8a monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Invitrogen, 12-0088-42).

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Flow Cytometry, MANN-WHITNEY

    ( A ) H&E staining and immunofluorescence staining for CD8a, p-SRC, YAP, and KRT5 on lung sections from COVID-19 patients. Scale bar: 50 μm. ( B ) Illustration of human AT2 organoid culture experiment. ( C – F ) Bright-field and immunofluorescence images of human AT2 organoids treated with PBS, IFN-γ, IFN-γ and Src inhibitor (dasatinib), or IFN-γ and FAK inhibitor (PF-573228). Scale bar: 25 μm. ( G – L ) Quantification of percentages of HTII-280–, SFTPC-, KRT8-, KRT17-, and KRT5-expressing organoids in total human AT2 organoids treated with PBS, IFN-γ, IFN-γ and Src inhibitor (dasatinib), or IFN-γ and FAK inhibitor (PF-573228) ( n = 3 technical replicates, experiment repeated twice). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Error bars represent means ± SEM. One-way ANOVA ( G – L ).

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: Viral infection induces inflammatory signals that coordinate YAP regulation of dysplastic cells in lung alveoli

    doi: 10.1172/JCI176828

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) H&E staining and immunofluorescence staining for CD8a, p-SRC, YAP, and KRT5 on lung sections from COVID-19 patients. Scale bar: 50 μm. ( B ) Illustration of human AT2 organoid culture experiment. ( C – F ) Bright-field and immunofluorescence images of human AT2 organoids treated with PBS, IFN-γ, IFN-γ and Src inhibitor (dasatinib), or IFN-γ and FAK inhibitor (PF-573228). Scale bar: 25 μm. ( G – L ) Quantification of percentages of HTII-280–, SFTPC-, KRT8-, KRT17-, and KRT5-expressing organoids in total human AT2 organoids treated with PBS, IFN-γ, IFN-γ and Src inhibitor (dasatinib), or IFN-γ and FAK inhibitor (PF-573228) ( n = 3 technical replicates, experiment repeated twice). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Error bars represent means ± SEM. One-way ANOVA ( G – L ).

    Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used at the indicated concentrations for immunofluorescence staining: goat anti-SCGB3A2 polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (R&D Systems, AF3465), rat anti-ITGB4 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 123615), rat anti-F4/80 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 111603), rabbit anti-CCR2 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Abcam, ab216863), rabbit anti-KRT5 polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 905504), chicken anti-KRT5 polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 905903), mouse anti-SCGB1A1 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., sc-365992), rabbit anti-CCSP polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Seven Hills, WRAB-3950), mouse anti-FOXJ1 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Invitrogen, 14-9965-82), hamster anti-PDPN monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Invitrogen, 14-5381-82), rat anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 100427), rat anti-CD8a monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 100707), mouse anti-NK1.1 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 108729), rabbit anti-DCAMKL1 polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Abcam, ab31704), rabbit anti-proSPC polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (MilliporeSigma, AB3786), rabbit anti-phospho-Src(Tyr416) polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Cell Signaling Technology, 2101S), rabbit anti-YAP polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Cell Signaling Technology, 4912S), mouse anti-KI67 monoclonal antibody(5 μg/mL) (BioLegend, 151204), rabbit anti-KI67 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Cell Signaling Technology, 9129S), mouse anti-P63 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Abcam, ab735), mouse anti-KRT17 monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., sc-393002), rat anti-KRT8 polyclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (DSHB, Troma-1), mouse anti-human HTII-280 (5 μg/mL) (Terrace Biotech, TB-27AHT2-280), and mouse anti-human CD8a monoclonal antibody (5 μg/mL) (Invitrogen, 12-0088-42).

    Techniques: Staining, Immunofluorescence, Expressing